Introduction

There's been a real surge in popularity of the ultra-wide market for desktop monitors, with a decent range of screens now available to suit most needs. There's more general all-round displays from the likes of Dell and LG available, with flat and curved models available. Then there's some more specialist, gamer-orientated displays around like the Acer Predator X34 and Asus ROG Swift PG348Q for instance, offering high end gaming features like G-sync and overclocked 100Hz refresh rates. What has attracted many people to this sector is the large screen size and high resolution of most models, with 3440 x 1440 being the preferred option above a hand full of 2560 x 1080 screens also available. The ultra-wide format with a 21:9 aspect ratio is an interesting format for split screen multi-tasking, as well as immersive wide screen gaming and models primarily in the 34" size range have really taken off. LG are set to the first to offer something a little different with their new 38UC99 display.

According to their website, the LG 38UC99 is aimed primarily at "designers, photographers, producers and other creative professionals who need more room for big ideas". Although the screen also boasts a fair few features for other users, including the gaming audience. There is AMD FreeSync support, a slightly boosted 75Hz refresh rate (above the normal 60Hz from most screens), a variety of gaming enhancements and options and even LG's new "1ms Motion Blur Reduction" mode. This is a new, larger format screen offering a 37.5" diagonal in a curved format, while maintaining a similar aspect ratio to the popular 34" models around. LG actually refer to this as a 21:9 aspect ratio ultra-wide screen on their website, but it is in fact slightly different at 24:10 (or 12:5 if you'd rather). The resolution is also a little higher than the 34" models at 3840 x 1600, and there's a wide range of features and extras included. While this screen isn't aimed at gamers, the additional gaming enhancements will certainly be tested throughout this review.

If you appreciate the review and enjoy reading and like our work, we would welcome a donation to the site to help us continue to make quality and detailed reviews for you.

Check Pricing and Buy - Affiliate Links

Amazon

TFTCentral is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme, an affiliate advertising programme designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.de, Amazon.ca and other Amazon stores worldwide. We also participate in a similar scheme for Overclockers.co.uk.

Specifications and Features

The following table gives detailed information about the specs of the screen:

The 38UC99 offers a good range of connectivity options with DisplayPort 1.2a, 2x HDMI 2.0 and USB type-C connections offered. HDMI 2.0 will support the full native resolution at 60Hz. DisplayPort will support refresh rate up t0 75Hz, including FreeSync support from compatible AMD graphics cards (52 - 75Hz range). For those unfamiliar with USB type-C, this interface can provide a single connection for video (60Hz, no FreeSync) as well as directly connecting the screen to PC via USB for data transfer and powering the on-board USB 3.0 ports, all through a single cable. The digital interfaces are HDCP certified for encrypted content and the video cables are provided in the box for DisplayPort, HDMI and USB type-C.

The screen has an external power supply and comes packaged with the power cable and rather large power brick you need. There are also 2x USB 3.0 ports located on the back of the screen with the video connections with one have charging capabilities as well. An audio headphone jack is also provided in case you don't want to use the built-in 2x 10W speakers. There's even a USB Bluetooth dongle which connects to the monitor and allows you to link your phone or other Bluetooth device to the screen and play music and audio through the speakers.

Below is a summary of the features and connections of the screen:

OSD Menu

Above: OSD control joystick on the bottom edge of the screen in the middle Click for larger version

The OSD menu is controlled through a single joystick control located on the bottom edge of the screen in the middle. It is a pressable button as well which glows white during normal operation, and flashes on/off white when the screen is in standby. This flashing is actually a little annoying, as it's fairly bright and you can see it reflecting against the stand and desk quite easily. Powering the screen off instead of leaving it in standby fixes that though as the LED is then turned off.

Pressing the joystick up or down (i.e. away from you or towards you) pops up a confirmation of your current input connection, as well as the active preset mode. You can't actually change anything though from this pop-up menu oddly. Pressing the joystick left or right allows you to adjust the volume control. You have to press the joystick button in to bring up any other menus. First you get the above quick access menu which sadly you aren't able to customise to options you'd prefer to have access to. You can quickly switch between inputs here and enable/disable the Bluetooth if you want. We aren't really sure why anyone would really need quick access to be able to turn the Bluetooth on and off though, we'd have preferred access to something else here. You can also enter the main menu by pressing right on the joystick from this quick access first menu.

Above: full top to bottom view of the OSD menu. Click for larger version

When you enter the main menu, a large OSD is shown on the right hand side of the screen, spanning from top to bottom. It's a big menu in size as you can see from the image above! The menu itself is split in to 5 sections down the left hand side. You can navigate quite easily using the joystick, although you do sometimes have to drill through several levels to get where you want. Once closed, the menu won't remember where you last were either, so you have to start navigation again. The options available in each of the 5 sections are shown on the right hand side. We have cropped the images below to show you just the available options, rather than a full view of the OSD software from top to bottom of the screen each time to save a bit of room.

The first 'quick settings' menu has options to control the brightness, contrast and volume, along with a couple of other options.

The input menu allows you to switch between the video inputs as well as control the hardware aspect ratio setting and the picture by picture (PbP) options. This is only really an option to split the screen in half if you want to show two inputs at the same time, with an even half/half split. No further PiP or PbP options are available which is a shame as the screen is so large, a variety of configurations would have been useful to some people.

The 'picture' menu has most of the other settings in it. You can adjust the preset mode via the 'picture mode' option. The 'picture adjust' section allows you to change brightness, contrast, sharpness and turn the dynamic contrast ratio on if you want.

The 'color adjust' section allows you to change the gamma setting, colour temp and adjust the RGB channels.

The 'game adjust' section allows you to alter the response time setting, turn FreeSync on/off and also has the Blur Reduction mode available. We will test all of these functions later in the review.

The 'sound' section of the menu is pretty self explanatory, as is the 'general' section shown above.

All in all there were a decent range of options available in the menu and a good control over most things. We would have liked the option to change the quick access options really, and some of the navigation got a bit tiresome through many levels of menu to get to where you want. Navigation was pretty intuitive thanks tot he joystick though, but the software felt a little big and chunky in the way it was presented.

 

Power Consumption

In terms of power consumption the manufacturer lists typical 'on' usage of 57W and 1.2W in standby. We carried out our normal tests to establish its power consumption ourselves.

We tested this ourselves and found that out of the box the screen used 60.1W at the default 100% brightness setting. Once calibrated the screen reached 35.0W consumption, and in standby it used only 1.1W. We have plotted these results below compared with other screens we have tested. The consumption is comparable to the other large ultra-wide screens we have tested as you might expect, with some of the smaller screens drawing less power (comparing the calibrated states).

Panel and Backlighting

Panel Part and Colour Depth

The LG 38UC99 features a LG.Display LM375QW1-SSA1 AH-IPS technology panel which is capable of producing 1.07 billion colours. This is achieved through a 8-bit+FRC colour depth as detailed in LG's specification. Keep in mind whether this 10-bit support is practically useable and whether you're ever going to truly use that colour depth. You need to have a full 10-bit end to end workflow to take advantage of it which is still quite expensive to achieve and rare in the market, certainly for your average user. This includes relevant applications and graphics cards as well, so to many people this 10-bit support might be irrelevant. This is the first panel of this size and format we have seen. The panel part is confirmed when dismantling the screen as shown below:

Screen Coating

The screen coating is a light anti-glare (AG) offering. It isn't a semi-glossy coating, but it is light as seen on other modern IPS type panels. Thankfully it isn't a heavily grainy coating like some old IPS panels feature and is also lighter than modern TN Film panel coating. It retains its anti-glare properties to avoid too many unwanted reflections of a full glossy coating, but does not produce an too grainy or dirty an image that some thicker AG coatings can.

Backlight Type and Colour Gamut

The screen uses a White-LED (W-LED) backlight unit which is standard in today's market. This helps reduce power consumption compared with older CCFL backlight units and brings about some environmental benefits as well. The W-LED unit offers a standard colour gamut which is approximately equal to the sRGB colour space. LG quote 99% coverage in their spec. Anyone wanting to work with wider colour spaces would need to consider wide gamut CCFL screens or the newer range of GB-r-LED type (and similar) displays available now. If you want to read more about colour spaces and gamut then please have a read of our detailed article.

Backlight Dimming and Flicker

We tested the screen to establish the methods used to control backlight dimming. Our in depth article talks in more details about a common method used for this which is called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). This in itself gives cause for concern to some users who have experienced eye strain, headaches and other symptoms as a result of the flickering backlight caused by this technology. We use a photosensor + oscilloscope system to measure backlight dimming control with a high level of accuracy and ease. These tests allow us to establish

1) Whether PWM is being used to control the backlight
2) The frequency and other characteristics at which this operates, if it is used
3) Whether a flicker may be introduced or potentially noticeable at certain settings

If PWM is used for backlight dimming, the higher the frequency, the less likely you are to see artefacts and flicker. The duty cycle (the time for which the backlight is on) is also important and the shorter the duty cycle, the more potential there is that you may see flicker. The other factor which can influence flicker is the amplitude of the PWM, measuring the difference in brightness output between the 'on' and 'off' states. Please remember that not every user would notice a flicker from a backlight using PWM, but it is something to be wary of. It is also a hard thing to quantify as it is very subjective when talking about whether a user may or may not experience the side effects.

100%                                                  50%                                                  0%
 
Above scale = 1 horizontal grid = 5ms

At 100% brightness a constant voltage is applied to the backlight. As you reduce the brightness setting to dim the backlight a Direct Current (DC) method is used, as opposed to any form of PWM. This applies to all brightness settings from 100% down to 0%. The screen is flicker free as a result as advertised, which is great news.

For an up to date list of all flicker-free (PWM free) monitors please see our Flicker Free Monitor Database.

 

Contrast Stability and Brightness

We conducted these tests in the default 'custom' picture adjust preset mode. The brightness control gave us a very good range of adjustment. At the top end the maximum luminance reached 309 cd/m² which was a little higher even than the specified maximum brightness of 300 cd/m² from the manufacturer. There was a decent 255 cd/m² adjustment range in total, and so at the minimum setting you could reach down to a fairly low luminance of 54 cd/m². This should be adequate for those wanting to work in darkened room conditions with low ambient light. A setting of 25 in the OSD menu should return you a luminance of around 120 cd/m² at default settings in this preset mode. It should be noted that the brightness regulation is controlled without the need for Pulse Width Modulation, using a Direct Current (DC) method for all brightness settings between 100 and 0% and so the screen is flicker free.

We have plotted the luminance trend on the graph above. The screen behaves as it should in this regard, with a reduction in the luminance output of the screen controlled by the reduction in the OSD brightness setting. This is a linear relationship as you can see.

The average contrast ratio of the screen was moderate for an IPS panel at 871:1. This was fairly stable across the brightness adjustment range as shown above with some fluctuation at around 50% brightness. We have seen some other modern IPS panels reach up to around 1100 - 1200:1 contrast ratios, so the 871:1 here was a little disappointing, although on par with many other IPS-type screens.

Testing Methodology

An important thing to consider for most users is how a screen will perform out of the box and with some basic manual adjustments. Since most users won't have access to hardware colorimeter tools, it is important to understand how the screen is going to perform in terms of colour accuracy for the average user.

We restored our graphics card to default settings and disabled any previously active ICC profiles and gamma corrections. The screen was tested at default factory settings using our new X-rite i1 Pro 2 Spectrophotometer combined with LaCie's Blue Eye Pro software suite. An X-rite i1 Display Pro colorimeter was also used to verify the black point and contrast ratio since the i1 Pro 2 spectrophotometer is less reliable at the darker end.

Targets for these tests are as follows:

• CIE Diagram - validates the colour space covered by the monitors backlighting in a 2D view, with the black triangle representing the displays gamut, and other reference colour spaces shown for comparison

• Gamma - we aim for 2.2 which is the default for computer monitors

• Colour temperature / white point - we aim for 6500k which is the temperature of daylight

• Luminance - we aim for 120 cd/m², which is the recommended luminance for LCD monitors in normal lighting conditions

• Black depth - we aim for as low as possible to maximise shadow detail and to offer us the best contrast ratio

• Contrast ratio - we aim for as high as possible. Any dynamic contrast ratio controls are turned off here if present

• dE average / maximum - as low as possible. If DeltaE >3, the color displayed is significantly different from the theoretical one, meaning that the difference will be perceptible to the viewer. If DeltaE <2, LaCie considers the calibration a success; there remains a slight difference, but it is barely undetectable. If DeltaE < 1, the color fidelity is excellent.

Default Performance and Setup

The 38UC99 is factory calibrated according to a 'quality assurance report' provided in the box. While this report tells you that it has been calibrated to 2.2 gamma, 6500k white point and dE < 5, it is a little unclear which mode it is referring to. We can only assume it is calibrated in the default setup of the screen which would be the 'custom' picture adjust mode. The report provided with our test sample is shown below for reference:

Default settings of the screen were as follows:

LG 38UC99 - Default Settings

   

 

Initially out of the box the screen was set in the default custom preset mode. With the maximum 100% brightness setting out of the box the screen was overly bright and uncomfortable to use, so you will definitely need to turn that down. You could tell the screen was using a standard gamut backlight as well with the naked eye, and the colour balance and temperature felt pretty good.

 

We went ahead and measured the default state with the i1 Pro 2. The CIE diagram on the left of the image confirms that the monitors colour gamut (black triangle) is fairly equal to the sRGB colour space. There is some minor over-coverage in greens and blues, and some very minor under-coverage in reds but not by anything significant. Default gamma was recorded at 2.2 average, leaving it with a minor 1% deviance from the target which was great news. We tested the other gamma settings available in the OSD menu which returned gamma0 = 2.0 average (10% deviance) and gamma2 = 2.4 average (8% deviance). The default gamma1 setting was obviously optimal here and close enough to our target to offer a reliable setup. That's good news, as gamma can be tricky to correct without a calibration device. White point was measured at a reasonably accurate 6235k, being 4% out from the 6500k we'd ideally want for desktop use. We tested some of the other preset modes and the 'photo' mode provided pretty much the same setup as this default 'custom' mode, except white point was a little better at 6507k (1% out). However, you do lose access to a lot of the picture and colour settings in that 'photo' preset mode, so probably best to stick to the 'custom' mode and use some of our settings.

 

Luminance was recorded at an extremely bright 321 cd/m² which is too high for prolonged general use. The screen was set at a default 100% brightness in the OSD menu but that is easy to change of course to reach a more comfortable setting without impacting any other aspect of the setup. The black depth was 0.375 cd/m² at this default brightness setting, giving us a moderate (for an IPS-type panel) static contrast ratio of 857:1. Colour accuracy was very good out of the box with an average dE of 0.9. Testing the screen with colour gradients showed smooth transitions in all shades, with some gradation evident in darker tones. Overall this default setup was very good and we were pleased with the results. A good factory calibration from LG here.

 

 

 

Calibration

 

We used the X-rite i1 Pro 2 Spectrophotometer combined with the LaCie Blue Eye Pro software package to achieve these results and reports. An X-rite i1 Display Pro colorimeter was used to validate the black depth and contrast ratios due to lower end limitations of the i1 Pro device.

 

LG 38UC99 - Calibrated Settings

   

 

We stuck to the 'custom' preset mode which offered us access to the RGB controls from within the menu. We adjusted the RGB channels and brightness setting as shown in the table above. All these OSD changes allowed us to obtain an optimal hardware starting point and setup before software level changes would be made at the graphics card level. We left the  LaCie software to calibrate to "max" brightness which would just retain the luminance of whatever brightness we'd set the screen to, and would not in any way try and alter the luminance at the graphics card level, which can reduce contrast ratio. These adjustments before profiling the screen would help preserve tonal values and limit banding issues. After this we let the software carry out the LUT adjustments and create an ICC profile.

 

Average gamma was now corrected to 2.2 average with a 0% deviance, correcting the minor 1% deviance we'd seen out of the box. The white point had now been corrected to 6493k, which corrected the 4% deviance we'd seen out of the box. Luminance had been improved thanks to the adjustment to the brightness control and was now being measured at 119 cd/m². This left us a black depth of 0.135 cd/m² and gave us a moderate static contrast ratio (for an IPS-type panel) of 879:1. Colour accuracy of the resulting profile was excellent, with dE average of 0.4 and maximum of 1.0. LaCie would consider colour fidelity to be very good overall. Testing the screen with various colour gradients showed smooth transitions. There was some gradation in darker tones but no banding introduced due to the adjustments to the graphics card LUT from the profilation of the screen. You can use our settings and try our calibrated ICC profile if you wish, which are available in our ICC profile database. Keep in mind that results will vary from one screen to another and from one computer / graphics card to another.

 

 

 

 

Calibration Performance Comparisons

 

The comparisons made in this section try to give you a better view of how each screen performs, particularly out of the box which is what is going to matter to most consumers. When comparing the default factory settings for each monitor it is important to take into account several measurement areas - gamma, white point and colour accuracy. There's no point having a low dE colour accuracy figure if the gamma curve is way off for instance. A good factory calibration requires all 3 to be well set up. We have deliberately not included luminance in this comparison since this is normally far too high by default on every screen. However, that is very easily controlled through the brightness setting (on most screens) and should not impact the other areas being measured anyway. It is easy enough to obtain a suitable luminance for your working conditions and individual preferences, but a reliable factory setup in gamma, white point and colour accuracy is important and not as easy to change accurately without a calibration tool.

 

From these comparisons we can also compare the calibrated colour accuracy, black depth and contrast ratio. After a calibration the gamma, white point and luminance should all be at their desired targets.

 

 

Default setup of the screen out of the box was very good thanks to the factory calibration. You have a reliable gamma curve with 2.2 average and a minor 1% deviance, along with a pretty accurate white point, being slightly too warm at 6235k (4% out). The colour accuracy is also excellent with an average dE of only 0.9. We were pleased with the out of the box performance and this should represent a decent setup for most people, and those without a calibration device need not worry. Some of the other ultra-wide screens we've tested have been pretty good out of the box too. For instance the 34" Dell U3415W had a reliable setup, as you can see from the above table. The 34" LG 34UM95 and gaming ultra-wides like the Acer Predator X34 / XR341CK showed a little more deviance from the targets when it came to gamma, but were still pretty decent.

 

 

 

The display was only moderate when it came to calibrated contrast ratio for an IPS-type panel. At 879:1 it was a little shy of the other ultra-wide IPS models we've tested in the past, which all surpassed the 1000:1 mark. Still, the contrast ratio wasn't terrible or anything, just not quite as high as we might have liked from a modern, newly produced IPS panel. Some IPS-type screens are starting to reach up to around 1200:1 nowadays. For instance the Dell U2417HJ (1228:1 - not shown) is our current champion when it comes to IPS technology. Of course none of these IPS panels can compete with VA panel types which can reach over 2000:1 easily, and commonly up to 3000:1 (e.g. Acer Predator Z35), even to 4000:1 in the case of the Philips BDM4065UC shown here.

Check Pricing and Buy - Affiliate Links

Amazon

TFTCentral is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Programme, an affiliate advertising programme designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.de, Amazon.ca and other Amazon stores worldwide. We also participate in a similar scheme for Overclockers.co.uk.

Viewing Angles

Above: Viewing angles shown from front and side, and  from above and below. Click for larger image

Viewing angles of the screen were very good as you would expect from an IPS-type panel. Horizontally there was very little colour tone shift until wide angles past about 45�. A slight darkening of the image occurred horizontally from wider angles as you can see above as the contrast shifted slighting. Contrast shifts were slightly more noticeable in the vertical field but overall they were very good. The screen offered the wide viewing angles of IPS technology and was free from the restrictive fields of view of TN Film panels, especially in the vertical plane. It was also free of the off-centre contrast shift you see from VA panels and a lot of the quite obvious gamma and colour tone shift you see from some of the modern VA panel type offerings.

Above: View of an all black screen from the side. Click for larger version

On a black image there is a characteristic pale glow introduced to the image when viewed from a wide angle, commonly referred to as IPS glow. This type of glow is common on most modern IPS-type panels and can be distracting to some users. If you view dark content from a normal head-on viewing position, you can actually see this glow as your eyes look towards the edges of the screen. Because of the sheer horizontal size of this 37.5" panel, the glow towards the edges is more obvious than on small screens, where there isn't such a long distance from your central position to the edges. Some people may find this problematic if they are working with a lot of dark content or solid colour patterns. In normal day to day uses, office work, movies and games you couldn't really notice this unless you were viewing darker content. If you move your viewing position back, which is probably likely for movies and games, the effect reduces as you do not have such an extreme angle from your eye position to the screen edges. The glow effect was a little less than on flat ultra-wide screens as the curved nature created a smaller angle between your eyes and the edges of the screen.

 

Panel Uniformity

We wanted to test here how uniform the brightness was across the screen, as well as identify any leakage from the backlight in dark lighting conditions. Measurements of the luminance were taken at 36 points across the panel on a pure white background. The measurements for luminance were taken using BasICColor's calibration software package, combined with an X-rite i1 Display Pro colorimeter with a central point on the screen calibrated to 120 cd/m². The below uniformity diagram shows the difference, as a percentage, between the measurement recorded at each point on the screen, as compared with the central reference point.

It is worth noting that panel uniformity can vary from one screen to another, and can depend on manufacturing lines, screen transport and other local factors. This is only a guide of the uniformity of the sample screen we have for review.
 

Uniformity of Luminance

The luminance uniformity of the screen was decent overall. There was a drop in luminance towards the sides of the screen, more so on the left, where in the worst case the luminance dropped to 102 cd/m² (-19%). That was the most extreme example though and in fact 95% of the screen was within a 10% deviance from the centrally calibrated point which was very good.

Backlight Leakage

Above: All black screen in a darkened room. Click for larger version

We also tested the screen with an all black image and in a darkened room. A camera was used to capture the result. The camera showed there was no real backlight bleed evident, but a little clouding from the four corners. Note that this picture was taken from a suitable distance to eliminate capturing viewing angle related IPS glow, which as we've said already may become a problem for some users on a screen this size.

Note: if you want to test your own screen for backlight bleed and uniformity problems at any point you need to ensure you have suitable testing conditions. Set the monitor to a sensible day to day brightness level, preferably as close to 120 cd/m² as you can get it (our tests are once the screen is calibrated to this luminance). Don't just take a photo at the default brightness which is almost always far too high and not a realistic usage condition. You need to take the photo from about 1.5 - 2m back to avoid capturing viewing angle characteristics, especially on IPS-type panels where off-angle glow can come in to play easily. Photos should be taken in a darkened room at a shutter speed which captures what you see reliably and doesn't over-expose the image. A shutter speed of 1/8 second will probably be suitable for this.

Support TFTCentral, buy the LG 38UC99 using our affiliate link

General and Office Applications

One of the key selling points of ultra-wide screens like the this is it's high resolution and large screen size. The 3840 x 1600 display offers a sharp but comfortable picture. Its pixel area is about 2.2 times larger than an Ultra-Wide Full HD 21:9 monitor (2560 x 1080), and about 3 times larger than a Full HD 16:9 monitor (1920 x 1080). It provides an efficient environment for using Microsoft Office programs and internet browsing, and split screen working is a pleasure. You can comfortably have the screen split in to 3 vertical sections if you want which is very nice. Thankfully the high resolution is of a very comfortable size on the 37.5" panel, with a 0.229mm pixel pitch it is very comparable to a 27" 2560 x 1440 monitor (0.2331mm) and the popular ultra-wide 34" 3440 x 1440 displays (0.2325mm). This means you are basically getting a slightly wider and slightly higher desktop area than the 34" models, with a similar font size. If you're coming from a lower resolution / larger pixel pitch you may still find the fonts look quite small to start with, but like the 27" 1440p models out there you soon get used to it. We continue to enjoy the curved format of these displays for day to day office work. It just felt more comfortable than a flat screen on a model as wide as this, bringing the corners a bit nearer to you. You didn't really notice the curve in normal use but we liked the feel. Probably down to user taste, so if in doubt try and see one in person.

The thin bezel design mean that the 38UC99 could be integrated into a multi-screen set up if you wanted as pictured above, although with the screen as big as it is, you'd need a very big desk! The light AG coating of the panel is welcome, and much better than the grainy and 'dirty' appearance of older IPS AG coatings. The wide viewing angles provided by this panel technology on both horizontal and vertical planes, helps minimize on-screen colour shift when viewed from different angles, making colour work and photo viewing a pleasure. The default factory setup of the screen was very good as well, offering an accurate gamma curve, accurate white point, pretty decent contrast ratio and low dE.

The brightness range of the screen was also very good, with the ability to offer a luminance between 309 and 54 cd/m². This should mean the screen is perfectly useable in a wide variety of ambient light conditions, including darkened rooms. A setting of ~25 in the OSD brightness control should return you a luminance close to 120 cd/m² out of the box. On another positive note, the brightness regulation is controlled without the need for the use of the now infamous Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM), and so those who suffer from eye fatigue or headaches associated with flickering backlights need not worry. There was no audible noise or buzzing from the screen, even when specifically looking for it using test images with a large amount of text at once. The screen also remains cool even during prolonged use.

By using the LG 'On Screen Control' software, users can select from 14 different Screen Split options to optimize Multi-tasking Windows organization and screen real estate use. The additional 'Dual Linkup' function means two individual devices can be connected to the monitor in a 1:1 aspect ratio, allowing the monitor to divide up the screen for both outputs. Whilst those two devices are shown in a single monitor, users can even share the contents from one device to the other.

There are a few extras provided here as well including a 2x port USB 3.0 hub on the back, one with charging support as well from one of them. There is an audio output for headphone connection if you want, with the display also offering 2x 10W stereo speakers. The provided Bluetooth dongle is a nice feature, allowing you to pair your phone or other Bluetooth device with the screen and play music etc through the speakers. There were no further extras such as ambient light sensors or card readers on this model which can be useful in office environments. There was a reasonable range of ergonomic adjustments available from the stand allowing you to obtain a comfortable position for a wide variety of angles of tilt, and a decent height adjustment range. Side to side swivel was sadly missing though. The VESA mounting support may also be useful to some people as well.

 

 
Responsiveness and Gaming

The 38UC99 is rated by LG as having a 5ms G2G response time which indicate the panel uses overdrive / response time compensation (RTC) technology to boost pixel transitions across grey to grey changes. The part being used is the LG.Display LM375QW1-SSA1 AH-IPS panel. Have a read about response time in our specs section if you need additional information about this measurement.

We will first test the screen using our thorough response time testing method. This uses an oscilloscope and photosensor to measure the pixel response times across a series of different transitions, in the full range from 0 (black) to 255 (white). This will give us a realistic view of how the monitor performs in real life, as opposed to being reliant only on a manufacturers spec. We can work out the response times for changing between many different shades, calculate the maximum, minimum and average grey to grey (G2G) response times, and provide an evaluation of any overshoot present on the monitor.

We use an ETC M526 oscilloscope for these measurements along with a custom photosensor device. Have a read of our response time measurement article for a full explanation of the testing methodology and reported data.
 

'Response Time' Setting (Overdrive)

The 'response time' setting is available via the picture > game adjust section of the OSD menu as shown above. We will test all four modes to see which is optimal first of all. Note that these results were the same from an NVIDIA and AMD test system, and at 60Hz and 75Hz refresh rate.

In the 'off' setting the response times were slow as you might expect from an IPS panel without overdrive. There was an average G2G response time of 18ms measured, but some transitions ranged up to 25 - 30ms. There was no overshoot since the overdrive impulse was turned off. When you turn the response time setting up a notch to 'slow' there is only a very slight change in response times, now measured at 16.4ms G2G average. Again, a change to 'normal' only makes a minor improvement down to 13.9ms G2G average. Even boosting the response times up to the maximum 'fast' mode gives you only an 10.8ms G2G average. At that setting you start to get some high overshoot creeping in on some transitions, although in practice it isn't overly obvious we found.

The IPS panel seems to struggle a bit when it comes to pixel response times which is a shame. The overdrive circuit attempts to boost them by the time you reach the maximum 'fast' setting, but the overshoot is then starting to become a problem. To give you an idea, a decent 60Hz IPS panel can reach about 8.5ms G2G without any overshoot in the best cases we've seen, so the LG 38UC99 is falling quite a bit short of that unfortunately. The screen isn't really aimed at gamers, despite carrying a few gaming features so this was perhaps not a key concern of LG. We'll talk a bit more about perceived motion clarity and performance in the following sections. For now, we'd probably recommend using the 'fast' response time setting despite the overshoot as the clarity is better and image is sharper. If you find the overshoot distracting for your particular uses, revert to the 'normal' setting.

The above examples from the PixPerAn tool should give you a further indication of the motion clarity, blurring etc seen in each of the response time settings.

 

Detailed Response Time Measurements

We stuck with what we consider to be the optimal 'fast' response time setting. We know from our tests in the previous section that this returned the fastest response times possible from this panel, although we have to live with some high levels of overshoot creeping in on some transitions. The average G2G response time was measured at 10.6ms which was a little slow overall for a standard refresh rate IPS-type panel. Rise times (changes from dark to light shades) were basically the same on average as fall times (changes from light to dark shades). The lowest response time measured was 5.9ms, almost reaching the advertised 5ms G2G figure.

If we evaluate the Response Time Compensation (RTC) overshoot then the results are mixed. There are a hand full of transitions where overshoot is very high, particularly those like 0 > 50 and 255 > 200 where the response times had been driven down to their lowest levels (6.5 and 5.9ms respectively). The overshoot was not evident on a huge portion of transitions and so in practice it didn't seem too severe. We still favoured this moderate overall overshoot to the slower 'normal' response time setting, as it returned a sharper and crisper motion clarity. As we said before, if you find overshoot becomes distracting, drop back to the 'normal' response time mode.

 

Display Comparisons

The above comparison table and graph shows you the lowest, average and highest G2G response time measurement for each screen we have tested with our oscilloscope system. There is also a colour coded mark next to each screen in the table to indicate the RTC overshoot error, as the response time figure alone doesn't tell the whole story.

The response time performance of the LG 38UC99 was a bit slower than many of the other IPS panels tested here, certainly when you compare it to the high refresh range (100Hz and above). With an average G2G response time of 10.6ms measured for the LG with moderate to high overshoot, it was a bit slower than the best case 60/75Hz IPS models which can reach down to around 8.5ms G2G without introducing any overshoot. It was also a bit slower, and with more overshoot, than ultra-wide models like the Dell U3415W and LG 34UM95. High refresh rate 144Hz IPS-type panels like the Asus ROG Swift PG279Q and Acer XB270HU can reach lower response times of around 5ms G2G thanks to the boosted refresh rate. TN Film models with high 144Hz refresh rate like the Asus ROG Swift PG278Q and Dell S2716DG reach even lower at around 2.9 - 3.1ms for instance with moderate overshoot.

 

The screen was also tested using the chase test in PixPerAn for the following display comparisons. As a reminder, a series of pictures are taken on the highest shutter speed and compared, with the best case example shown on the left, and worst case example on the right. This should only be used as a rough guide to comparative responsiveness but is handy for a comparison between different screens and technologies as well as a means to compare those screens we tested before the introduction of our oscilloscope method.

37.5" 5ms G2G LG.Display AH-IPS  (Response Time = Fast)

In practice the LG 38UC99 showed moderate levels of blurring on moving images with some overshoot appearing in some transitions. There wasn't much overshoot detected in these specific colour transitions in the PixPerAn tool, but we know from our oscilloscope tests that some transitions show a high overshoot. We still felt this 'fast' response time setting returned a slight sharper and clearer moving image than the 'normal' mode.

37.5" 5ms G2G LG.Display AH-IPS  (Response Time = Fast)

34" 4ms G2G LG.Display AH-IPS @ 100Hz (OD = Normal)

34" 4ms G2G LG.Display AH-IPS @ 100Hz (OD = Normal)

34" 4ms G2G LG.Display AH-IPS @ 75Hz (OD = Normal)

34" 8ms G2G LG.Display AH-IPS (Response Time = Normal)

34" 5ms G2G LG.Display AH-IPS (Response Time = Middle)

We can compare the 38UC99 to some of the other ultra-wide screens we have tested here as well. The 34" gamer-oriented Acer Predator X34 and Asus ROG Swift PG348Q can both be overclocked to 100Hz, and that results in an improvement to the response times, which makes them a better gaming option than the LG screen. They have smoother and sharper moving images and the boosted refresh rate really makes a difference of course. The more generalist 34" Dell U3415W and LG 34UM95 are a little closer to the LG 38UC99 in responsiveness, showing a fairly similar level of blurring to the moving image. Although those two models are free from any obvious overshoot, and so put them a little ahead of the 38UC99.

 

Refresh Rate and FreeSync

The 38UC99 supports a refresh rate of 60Hz natively, but this can be boosted up to 75Hz simply from within your graphics card settings. When enabled, and from a compatible system, FreeSync is also available which operates in a range between 52 and 75Hz.

From an NVIDIA test system (GTX 970) we found stable performance without any frames being dropped at 60Hz, which you would certainly hope for. However, when we increased the refresh rate up to 75Hz frames began to be dropped quite noticeably. Even basic motion tests like the PixPerAn tool showed consistent stuttering and jumping movements and the BlurBusters.com frame skipping test showed obvious frame skipping as well unfortunately. We couldn't find a way to resolve this unfortunately, so it looks as if from NVIDIA systems, you are limited to 60Hz refresh rate. See the following section though for how the Blur Reduction function works from an NVIDIA system.

From an AMD system (Radeon R9 290 series) we had better results. At 60Hz there was no frame skipping at all. Initially when you boost the refresh rate up to 75Hz in Windows you get the same obvious frame skipping as from the NVIDIA system, which was worrying at first. However, all you need to do is enable the FreeSync option from within the OSD and that seems to fix the issue. Even if you turn FreeSync off from the AMD control panel, the 75Hz operation then works properly without frame skipping. Using the BlurBusters test again showed no frame drops at 75Hz synced refresh rate, and the PixPerAn motion tests showed smooth, stutter-free movement. So if you want to use 75Hz refresh rate, make sure you've enabled FreeSync within the OSD first, regardless of whether you're going to enable it from your graphics card or not. This trick didn't work sadly from an NVIDIA system, we did try. You will get some minor improvements in perceived motion clarity through the increase of the refresh rate from 60Hz to 75Hz on an AMD card, due to the increase frame rate and refresh rate. It's not as significant as moving from a 60Hz to a 120Hz/144Hz refresh rate panel, but it's a small improvement at least. The added FreeSync support is certainly welcome given the high resolution of this screen, as powering 3840 x 1600 at a consistent 75Hz is going to be a challenge for many systems and graphics cards. The FreeSync dynamic range between 52 - 75Hz will help eliminate tearing and other issues you might face otherwise, as frame rate fluctuates. Do keep in mind that even with FreeSync available here, there is a huge strain on your system to run a resolution like this.

 

1ms Motion Blur Reduction Mode

This is a new feature LG are advertising on some of their screens now, the so-called "1ms Motion Blur Reduction" mode. We can confirm that on the LG 38UC99 this is in fact an added strobed backlight feature, designed to help reduce perceived motion blur in practice. Our in depth article about Blur Reduction Backlights talks more about these methods and how they help reduce motion blur for the user, so it's well worth having a read of that if this principle is new to you. This strobed backlight on the 38UC99 is not linked specifically to AMD FreeSync (like ULMB is linked to NVIDIA G-sync) and we're pleased to confirm you can use this feature from NVIDIA cards as well as AMD.

The 1ms Motion Blur Reduction setting is available in the OSD menu in the 'game adjust' section, and is only available when you've set the screen to a 75Hz refresh rate in Windows. It is greyed out at 60Hz. If you enable it with FreeSync active, it also turns off the FreeSync setting in the OSD menu, so as expected it is not possible to use both at the same time. Actually, that is a little annoying, as when you want to turn Blur Reduction off, you also have to re-enable FreeSync if you were using it. It also requires you to drill in to the menu a few levels to get to these settings, and maybe it would have been handy to be able to make this setting one of the quick access options instead if you wanted. Since the feature is only available at 75Hz you may wonder whether that makes it unusable from an NVIDIA system, since we found in our previous section that frames were dropped very noticeably at 75Hz from NVIDIA cards. In fact, if you run an NVIDIA system at 75Hz with this Blur Reduction mode enabled, it doesn't seem to drop any frames any more and you get a smooth, stutter-free movement in simple motion tests which before were very stuttery and jumpy. The BlurBusters frame skipping test also showed no frame drops. So it seems you can at least use this feature from an NVIDIA system without issue at 75Hz, you just can't run the screen at 75Hz refresh rate normally for some reason.

Blur Reduction Mode Strobing at 75Hz, scale = 5ms

Once enabled, we can test the strobing via our oscilloscope as shown above. The strobing cycles the backlight completely off and on in sync with the refresh rate of the screen. So each strobe lasts 13.33ms, and there's 75 strobes per second (75Hz). This is both a good and bad thing. On the one hand, at 75Hz the strobing is pretty visible to the naked eye, certainly when you switch it on in desktop use the flicker is very obvious and hard on the eyes. Typically strobed backlights are not available on screens unless they can support high refresh rates natively. Then they tend to be available with an 85Hz typical minimum option, ranging up to 100, 120 and 144Hz in some cases. It's preferable to run the strobing at the highest supported refresh rate frequency since it helps reduce the visible flicker and offers an improved experience in terms of blur reduction (at the cost of some slight brightness reduction admittedly). Even the 85Hz lowest option tends to be problematic to many people as the flicker is too noticeable and hard on the eyes. Here on the 38UC99 the maximum available refresh rate is 75Hz and so you are more limited in its operation and will have to live with some visible flicker in some situations. In dynamic content like gaming, it is less obvious and harder to see but may still add a strain to the eyes for some users. You certainly wouldn't want to enable it for any other uses that's for sure. User experience and susceptibility to the flicker will vary from person to person, but it's likely to be hard on the eyes for a large portion of users we expect.

The other option which can be used by manufacturers is to use a "double strobe" system, where the strobing is done twice per frame. In this scenario at 75Hz that would in theory result in 150 strobes per second. That might seem a better option as it would certainly be less harmful on the eyes and the visible flicker would be significantly reduced or eliminated for some users. However, double strobing isn't a great system we have seen in the past as it tends to lead to double images and ghosting issues on moving content. So here, LG have at least stuck with a single strobe system which makes it useable, albeit with the risks of some visible flicker to the user.

Enabling the Blur Reduction backlight has a usual impact on the luminance of the display. Thankfully you can still alter the brightness setting in the OSD menu although it should be noted that there are no other controls or options to adjust the strobe timing or strobe length or anything like that. A consideration for users of these blur reduction backlights is the maximum brightness you can still achieve with the feature enabled. Here, it is a decent 213 cd/m² which is still pretty bright and at least should allow the feature to be used for gaming where brightness needs to be a little higher than normal every day use. Unfortunately, the menu does not remember a brightness setting for Blur Reduction on and off modes, so you have to manually change the brightness slider when you enable Blur Reduction, and then when you turn it back off (unless you just stick with the same brightness setting of course). A typical every day brightness of around 25% would be comfortable for normal desktop use, but when you enable blur reduction the resulting 70 cd/m² may be too dark for gaming.

Note: Pulse Width setting at max where applicable.
*Note 2: The Acer XB270HU was later updated to include a 120Hz mode, which will produce a slightly darker maximum luminance

If we compare the max luminance of all the screens we've tested with a blur reduction strobed backlight we can see that the LG offers a brighter display than most of the other options, which is a good thing. Yes, the frequency of the strobing has some impact and at 75Hz it is quite a lot lower than the frequency of the other displays, as we've already talked about above.

Blur Reduction Tests

 

Pursuit camera photo from central area of the screen

 

Of course the main thing we want to test is what improvements the Blur Reduction mode offers when it comes to motion clarity and gaming. We were pleased with the results we'd seen from LightBoost backlights when we tested them, and also from the natively supported blur reduction feature on other displays including the popular gaming models we've tested as listed above. We were pleased with the results here from the Blur Reduction backlight. Tracking of moving objects became much easier and the image looked sharper and clearer. As we've already said, there's only one refresh rate that this works at (75Hz) so you are a little limited, and will have to live with some possible flicker issues due to the low strobing frequency. The above pursuit camera image gives you an idea of the image sharpness and clarity with this feature enabled. This was taken from the centre area of the screen where the image is clearest. Because the response times were fairly slow (certainly compared with fast TN Film models), you still get some ghosting images behind the moving object, although it looks sharper and clearer thanks to the strobing backlight.

 

 

Pursuit camera photos representing strobe cross talk from top to bottom regions of the screen.

 

We used the BlurBusters full-screen TestUFO online motion test as well, to help establish the image clarity at different areas of the screen. This is represented by the image above which gives you a sample from 5 areas of the screen, from top to bottom. The middle region of the screen was the clearest with some strobe cross-talk becoming evident as you reached the top and bottom. LG seemed to have got the strobe timing at a nice level to maximise performance in the central region though which was good, as that's where most of your focus is in games. It is impossible to eliminate strobe cross-talk completely due to the way they operate, but the important thing is whereabouts on the screen this manifests itself and to what level. The central region is probably the most important since that's where a lot of your gaming focus will be, where crosshairs and the likes are. This was a pretty decent implementation of a strobe backlight system here, especially since there is a refresh rate limitation here (75Hz max) and most manufacturers wouldn't attempt to add a feature like this unless the screen supported 120Hz refresh rate at least. It's not perfect, as the frequency is low and flicker may well be problematic to some users. The response times also aren't particularly fast so you don't get the nice clear image you might get from other blur reduction screens. However, at least it is offered as an option if you want to try it, or find it useful. We were also pleased that this is a feature of the monitor itself and so can be used no matter what your graphics card choice is. Obviously in an ideal World you could use it with FreeSync as well, but that will take some doing from the manufacturers to get working.

Additional Gaming Features

Aspect Ratio Control - the 38UC99 has 5 options for aspect ratio control through the OSD 'Display' menu as shown above. There are options for full wide, original, 1:1 pixel mapping and 2 different 'cinema' modes. The cinema modes are designed for 21:9 full screen viewing, with and without captions. The presence of an 'original' mode to maintain the source aspect (but fill as much of the screen as possible), and 1:1 pixel mapping should be very useful, and certainly welcome given not all content and inputs are this 24:10 native aspect ratio.

Preset Modes - There are several specific game preset modes available from the 'picture mode' menu. There are FPS Game 1, FPS Game 2, RTS Game and Custom (Game) modes to choose from. All have differing preset values, with some settings being locked in certain cases like sharpness and even the response time control. These modes may be useful if you want a slightly different setup for gaming, perhaps with accentuated sharpness and a brighter display which would be fairly typical. You could even set a mode up to have the Blur Reduction backlight enabled by default.

Black Stabilizer - You can adjust this slider to change the black saturation levels in dark images, to help bring out detail in darker scenes. Might be useful if you play a lot of darker games.

Lag

We have written an in depth article about input lag and the various measurement techniques which are used to evaluate this aspect of a display. It's important to first of all understand the different methods available and also what this lag means to you as an end-user.

Input Lag vs. Display Lag vs. Signal Processing

To avoid confusion with different terminology we will refer to this section of our reviews as just "lag" from now on, as there are a few different aspects to consider, and different interpretations of the term "input lag". We will consider the following points here as much as possible. The overall "display lag" is the first, that being the delay between the image being shown on the TFT display and that being shown on a CRT. This is what many people will know as input lag and originally was the measure made to explain why the image is a little behind when using a CRT. The older stopwatch based methods were the common way to measure this in the past, but through advanced studies have been shown to be quite inaccurate. As a result, more advanced tools like SMTT provide a method to measure that delay between a TFT and CRT while removing the inaccuracies of older stopwatch methods.

In reality that lag / delay is caused by a combination of two things - the signal processing delay caused by the TFT electronics / scaler, and the response time of the pixels themselves. Most "input lag" measurements over the years have always been based on the overall display lag (signal processing + response time) and indeed the SMTT tool is based on this visual difference between a CRT and TFT and so measures the overall display lag. In practice the signal processing is the element which gives the feel of lag to the user, and the response time of course can impact blurring, and overall image quality in moving scenes. As people become more aware of lag as a possible issue, we are of course keen to try and understand the split between the two as much as possible to give a complete picture.

The signal processing element within that is quite hard to identify without extremely high end equipment and very complicated methods. In fact the studies by Thomas Thiemann which really kicked this whole thing off were based on equipment worth >100,1000 Euro, requiring extremely high bandwidths and very complicated methods to trigger the correct behaviour and accurately measure the signal processing on its own. Other techniques which are being used since are not conducted by Thomas (he is a freelance writer) or based on this equipment or technique, and may also be subject to other errors or inaccuracies based on our conversations with him since. It's very hard as a result to produce a technique which will measure just the signal processing on its own unfortunately. Many measurement techniques are also not explained and so it is important to try and get a picture from various sources if possible to make an informed judgement about a display overall.

For our tests we will continue to use the SMTT tool to measure the overall "display lag". From there we can use our oscilloscope system to measure the response time across a wide range of grey to grey (G2G) transitions as recorded in our response time tests. Since SMTT will not include the full response time within its measurements, after speaking with Thomas further about the situation we will subtract half of the average G2G response time from the total display lag. This should allow us to give a good estimation of how much of the overall lag is attributable to the signal processing element on its own.

 

Lag Classification

To help in this section we will also introduce a broader classification system for these results to help categorise each screen as one of the following levels:

• Class 1) Less than 16ms / 1 frame lag - should be fine for gamers, even at high levels

• Class 2) A lag of 16 - 32ms / One to two frames - moderate lag but should be fine for many gamers. Caution advised for serious gaming and FPS

• Class 3) A lag of more than 32ms / more than 2 frames - Some noticeable lag in daily usage, not suitable for high end gaming

For the full reviews of the models compared here and the dates they were written (and when screens were approximately released to the market), please see our full reviews index.

We have provided a comparison above against other models we have tested to give an indication between screens. The screens tested are split into two measurements which are based on our overall display lag tests (using SMTT) and half the average G2G response time, as measured by the oscilloscope. The response time is split from the overall display lag and shown on the graph as the green bar. From there, the signal processing (red bar) can be provided as a good estimation.

The screen showed a total average display lag of 24.7 ms as measured with SMTT 2. Taking into account half the average G2G response time at 5.3ms, we can estimate that there is ~19.4ms of signal processing lag on this screen which is just over 1 frame at 60Hz. This is fairly typical result from a screen with a built in scaler and not specifically geared at gaming with low lag.

 

Movies and Video

The following summarises the screens performance in video applications:

• 37.5" screen size makes it a good option for an all-in-one multimedia screen, but being quite a bit smaller than most modern LCD TV's of course even at this massive size.

• 24:10 aspect ratio is more well suited to videos, more so than the wide range of 16:9 format screens around, leaving smaller borders on DVD's and wide screen content at the top and bottom.

• 3840 x 1600 resolution can support full 1080 HD resolution content

• Digital interfaces support HDCP for any encrypted and protected content

• Good range of connectivity options provided with DisplayPort, USB type-C and 2x HDMI offered.

• Cables provided in the box for DisplayPort, USB type-C and HDMI (x1).

• Light AG coating providing clean and clear images, without the unwanted reflections of a glossy solution.

• Wide brightness range adjustment possible from the display, including a maximum luminance of ~309 cd/m² and a decent minimum luminance of 54 cd/m². This should afford you good control for different lighting conditions. Brightness regulation is controlled without the need for PWM and so is flicker free for all brightness settings.

• Black depth and contrast ratio are moderate for an IPS-type panel at 879:1 after calibration. Most detail in darker scenes should still not be lost even though the contrast ratio is not as strong as other competing IPS panels.

• There is a specific 'cinema' preset mode available for movies or video if you want which doesn't look that dissimilar to our calibrated custom mode, other than the brightness being at 100% and some of the other settings now being greyed out and locked. Might be useful to set up at a specific brightness level for movies though.

• Adequate pixel responsiveness which should be able to handle fast moving scenes in movies without issue. Low overshoot issues which is pleasing in the normal mode, which you may want to stick to for movies. The 'cinema' preset mode is locked to this response time mode in fact.

• Wide viewing angles thanks to IPS-type panel technology meaning several people could view the screen at once comfortable and from a whole host of different angles.

• IPS glow is typical, meaning you might experience some annoying white glows on darker content from an angle.

• Good and easy to use tilt and height ergonomic adjustments available from the stand, although the lack of a side to side swivel function is a shame for re-positioning the screen for movie viewing from a distance, or with other people.

• No noticeable backlight leakage, and none from the edges which is good. This type of leakage may prove an issue when watching movies where black borders are present but it is not a problem here.

• 2x 10W integrated stereo speakers on this model. There is also an audio output connection for headphones if needed.

• Decent range of hardware aspect ratio options including 'original' aspect ratio retention and a 1:1 pixel mapping mode.

• Picture in picture (PiP) and Picture By Picture (PbP) are not available, other than a half and half split screen function (PbP) for displaying two inputs at once.
   

Conclusion

If you appreciate this review and enjoy reading and like our work, we would welcome a donation to the site to help us continue to make quality and detailed reviews for you. This was the first screen to market in this size and format, and so it was interesting to put the 38UC99 through our tests. First of all, the huge screen size and high resolution was a pleasure to work with in day to day general uses, including office applications, split screen web work and photo viewing. The 3840 x 1600 resolution is a bit of a bump from the range of 3440 x 1440 ultra-wide models around, although not massive, but on a screen this big it offers a comfortable pixel pitch and text size without needing to worry about operating system scaling. The design of the screen was nice we thought with a sleek white back and a nice set of connections and extras provided. The stand was also good on the most part, although side to side swivel was missed a bit on a large screen like this. LG have done a nice job offering a good range of connections, and even providing the cables for them all in the box too. The additional Bluetooth dongle was a nice added extra as well.

Performance wise we were impressed with the default factory setup of the screen which should be fine for most users once you turn the brightness down to a comfortable level. The only slight disappointment was the moderate contrast ratio of 879:1 (after calibration) which we would have liked to have been up over 1000:1 really for a modern IPS panel. The flicker free backlight and light AG coating were welcome as ever. The panel provides the usual all-round performance benefits of IPS technology, including wide viewing angles and a stable image. There is the usual IPS-glow levels from this panel so some users will need to be wary of that if they find this glow on dark content a problem. It becomes more apparent given the large screen size and ultra-wide format, although the subtle curve helps a little. The screen does very well we felt for its target market, and for those wanting a decent all-rounder with a large size and resolution.

When it comes to gaming the 38UC99 was an interesting display to test. On the one hand, the screen isn't really aimed at the gaming market, so perhaps we shouldn't expect too much. On the other hand, there are a decent range of features included for gaming needs so it is bound to attract some interest from that audience as a result. It's pretty good overall, although not perfect. The panels pixel response times weren't as good as we had hoped for from a modern IPS panel, which was a bit of a shame. The 75Hz boosted refresh rate and FreeSync support make gaming from an AMD system a reasonable option if you can power the high resolution effectively, although there is some moderate lag to live with still. NVIDIA systems will be limited to 60Hz sadly, and missing the dynamic refresh rate support of course. You can use the added Blue Reduction backlight from either an AMD or NVIDIA system which is an interesting addition, and quite a brave one from LG given the low supported refresh rate. They've provided support for it here and so those who benefit from blur reduction backlights will be pleased with the single strobe implementation, decent enough results in practice and at least some support being provided. There is a question of flicker at such a low refresh rate and strobing frequency so be careful.